It's wierd, the feeling of place here.
What brings this up is that I was watching some of Macklemore's videos on youtube. I noticed how much of affinity he has for the northwest, and specifically Seattle.
As I explore this area, I am really quite confused. The lifestyles (or what I have seen so far) do not come from the dichotomy I have seen up to this point in my life, and the dichotomy I studied in college.
When I was at Wilson I studied manufactured identity versus placelesness. It was either: people manufactured their place and their identity with that place (or a few of places), or they saw themselves as being with no place, therefore having no affinity with one (or a couple of) particular place(s).
Yet here, it seems like Vancouver does not inherit either of those sides. Don't get me wrong. I am not talking about Portland here. Too many people seem to lump that in with Vancouver. What I am saying is that what I have seen from Vancouver is a strange third way of creating an identity.
I have always been a fan of the multiple dynamic idea of things. My very thesis was rooted in proving through historical evidence that culture is ever changing, and is never standing still. So there is always another way to think about these things.
I went to a free (yet sadly short) concert yesterday in the city center portion of Vancouver. As I sat there listening, I observed the people around me. There was about equal parts young, middle aged, and old, a dynamic that I had never really been in. Their clothes and conversation seemed to be revolving around their lives and the band. There were no essentric outfits, rarely any plaid (contrary to stereotypes) and the conversations seemed to revolve around the labor day weekend, their upcoming school projects, and the many different outings coming up for fun before autumn and winter settle in. The people did not seem like they were hiding in the shadows lightly mingling with others, placeless in a space full of well identified people. Nor were they pushing thier identities on each others trying to win a "my identity is better than yours" contest. They just seemed to be relaxing vancouverites, enjoying their city.
This is in comparison to the well manufactured and defendent southern identity I have lived with in the North Carolina mountains, nor was it the free roaming spirits I have seen from the heartland identity, who just want to get the hell out of dodge and pick up what ever identity they can along the way. This was a different type of identity, one well rooted in city and neighborhood, not regionalism or nationalism.
Maybe it is because of their young history and their hodgepodge of migrants. One thing we in the east tend to forget is that a lot of towns out west were established after the Civil War, and many not even incorporated until the early 20th century! This collection of differences has maybe not given the region time to settle and establish an idenity, and the cities and towns were not laid out in such a fashion to create drifters and brain drain.
Or maybe it is just people being themselves and being, dare I say it, authentic? (If that can even hold ground because of its subjectivity.)