Let me explain.
I'll wrap up a little of my recent experiences through examination of landscapes:
So there are landscapes that exist which are meant to exist. I've visited a couple of those in the last couple of weeks:
![]() |
The drive from Aberdeen along the Pacific Coast. |
![]() |
The pacific coast. |
![]() |
A panorama from a lookout at Gray's Harbor |
![]() |
Alder's Flat in Mt. Hood National Forest. (Auto-Awesome Photo, just giving full disclaimer) |
![]() |
More of Alder's Flat |
![]() |
Entrance to Willamete National Forest |
![]() |
Sunset in Salem |
![]() |
And of course, the catalyst, in the Steigerwald National Wildlife Refuge |
So what makes these "correct" landscapes? is it because of their pretty scenery? Their forested hills around them? How about their inclusion of nature?
Well all of those help a landscape, but none of them really make or break a landscape in the grand scheme of things. It is really the fact that the areas of the landscapes in the pictures "fit". They run together with what is around them, with most things flowing well into and out of the scene.
This weekend, I discovered Yakima. A lonely valley in the middle of the high desert, turned Garden of Eden by the modern power of irrigation.
Its strange. You are driving through the high desert in central Washington. You've seen it all before, the endless plains of scrub brush and tender dry grass, resisting the massive wind the best in can. Just waiting under a Red Flag warning to eradicate all before its hellish fire.
So far, so good.
The plains turn into mountains, the mountains into barren hills. Then, as soon as you round a corner:
BAM!
Fields of green, yellow, and brown stretch out throughout the valley below. It is a valley, full of the richest vegetables, fruits, and buildings you can imagine. The valley stretches out beyond what the mind can imagine. Off in the distance are faint, hazy hills, yellow and brown as the previous ones you were just driving through. But halfway up the sides, a dark green is visible. Those are fruit trees and they stretch up just as far as the water can go.
The valley is built on this source. Water. It needs it. It feeds off of it. It produces with it. Without it, it would be just another desert valley, with a river running through it.
But why? That is my ever present question. Why is it that this valley, and this river, gave rise to one of Washington's greatest food producing regions? Why is it that this place was settled on as that place? I don't really know. How much water does it use? This land, I don't think it was meant to be food production, I think it was meant to be a subtle little pocket of high desert river life. So what have we made/gained/lost with this development?
Its weird. I've never been in a place that isn't meant to belong there. All of my landscapes have flowed, fit together, and transitioned into different settings quite well. This place comes upon you as the perfectly created wonderland of local food. But was it supposed to be that way?